journal of tropical medicine and infectious diseases research
2026, Vol 1 No 1-2, Issue 001
Presentation And Management
Outcome Of Fournier's Gangrene: A Two-Centre Study
*Ogbetere FE¹, Agbo CA², Ogbetere YN3
¹Department of Surgery, Edo State University, Iyamho, Edo State, Nigeria
²Department of
Surgery, Rev Fr Moses Orshio Adasu University, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
3Department of Public
and Community Health, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Edo State,
Nigeria
*Corresponding author: Friday
Emeakpor Ogbetere
Email:
fridayemeakpor@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rapidly
progressive and life-threatening necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum,
genitalia, and perianal region. It carries a high mortality rate in
resource-limited settings, where delayed presentation and inadequate healthcare
infrastructure compound management challenges.The aim of this study is to
determine the clinical presentation, management patterns, and predictors of
mortality among patients with Fournier's gangrene managed at two tertiary
centres in Nigeria. This was a retrospective review of medical records of all
patients managed for Fournier's gangrene over five years at two tertiary
referral centres in Nigeria was conducted. Data on sociodemographic profile,
clinical presentation, Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI), management,
and outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used for
continuous variables; Fisher's exact test compared categorical variables
between survivors and non-survivors; and logistic regression analysis was used
to evaluate predictors of mortality. Thirteen patients (all male) were managed
during the study period, with a mean age of 47.9 ± 12.9 years (range 28-76
years). The scrotal region was the commonest site of involvement (46.2%).
Diabetes mellitus and smoking were each present in 46.2% of cases. HIV
seropositivity was documented in 15.4%. All patients underwent aggressive
surgical debridement (mean 4.9 ± 1.8 procedures) combined with broad-spectrum
antibiotics. The predominant organisms isolated were Escherichia coli and
Staphylococcus aureus (each 46.2%), with polymicrobial infection in 38.5%. Two
patients (15.4%) died. HIV seropositivity was the only variable significantly
associated with mortality (p = 0.002). Fournier's gangrene in our environment
predominantly affects middle-aged men, with diabetes mellitus and smoking as
key predisposing factors. HIV seropositivity was a significant predictor of
mortality. Early aggressive surgical debridement, targeted antibiotic therapy,
and HIV screening on admission are essential to improving survival outcomes.
Keywords: Fournier's gangrene, necrotizing
fasciitis, HIV, debridement, Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index
INTRODUCTION
Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rare but
devastating form of synergistic necrotizing fasciitis affecting the perineum,
genitalia, and perianal region. First described by the French dermatologist
Jean Alfred Fournier in 1883, the condition is characterized by a rapidly
progressive course, polymicrobial aetiology, and historically high mortality
rates.¹ Although once considered idiopathic, contemporary evidence has
identified several predisposing conditions including diabetes mellitus (DM),
immunosuppression, alcoholism, malignancy, and genitourinary instrumentation as
major risk factors.²,³
Despite advances in critical care and
antimicrobial therapy, the mortality rate associated with FG remains between 7%
and 45% globally, with higher rates reported in African and other
resource-limited settings where delayed presentation, limited diagnostic
capacity, and suboptimal perioperative care are common.⁴,⁵
In Nigeria, the burden of FG is compounded by late hospital attendance
attributable to poverty, low health literacy, and reliance on traditional
remedies.⁶
The Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI),
derived from nine physiological parameters, was introduced by Laor et al. in
1995 as a validated tool for predicting mortality.⁷ Although widely
applied globally, its predictive utility in sub-Saharan African populations
remains incompletely characterized. Furthermore, the role of HIV infection, as
a determinant of outcome in FG, has received limited systematic attention in
the local literature.
This study aimed to describe the clinical
presentation, microbiological profile, management approaches, and predictors of
mortality in patients managed for FG at two tertiary referral centres in
Nigeria over a six-year period.
MATERIALS, PATIENTS, AND METHODS
This was a retrospective, descriptive study
conducted at [CA1] Edo
State University Teaching Hospital, Auchi and Benue State University Teaching
Hospital, Makurdi, Nigeria. The study covered a five-year period.
All patients managed for Fournier's gangrene
during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Diagnosis was based on
clinical criteria: the presence of genital or perineal necrotizing soft-tissue
infection with characteristic clinical features of putrid odour, crepitus, skin
necrosis, and systemic sepsis. Medical records were reviewed and data extracted
using a structured pro forma. Variables collected included age, sex, marital
status, occupation, site of disease involvement, predisposing comorbidities
(diabetes mellitus, hypertension, HIV serostatus, steroid use, post-operative
or traumatic antecedent, smoking), vital signs at presentation (temperature,
respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure), laboratory parameters (urea,
creatinine, packed cell volume [PCV], white blood cell count [WBC], lymphocyte
count, platelets, total protein, albumin), wound microbiology, number of
debridements, mode of wound cover, hospital stay duration, and outcome
(survived or died).
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics
version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics including
mean and standard deviation (SD) were used for continuous variables, with range
reported where appropriate. Fisher's exact test was applied to compare
categorical variables between survivors and non-survivors. The Mann-Whitney U
test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous variables
between the two outcome groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to
evaluate predictors of mortality. Statistical significance was set at p <
0.05.
Ethical approval
was obtained from the Institutional Review Committees of both study centres in
accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and patient data were anonymised
prior to analysis. Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review
Committees in view of the retrospective nature of the study.
RESULTS
Thirteen patients with Fournier's gangrene were
managed during the study period. All patients were male (13; 100%), with a mean
age of 47.9 ± 12.9 years (range 28–76 years). The majority were married (10;
76.9%) and engaged in trading (5; 38.5%) or farming (4; 30.8%). The commonest
site of disease involvement was the scrotum, either alone or with perineal
extension (Table 1).
Diabetes mellitus was the commonest
predisposing comorbidity, present in six patients (46.2%), followed by smoking
in six (46.2%), hypertension in three (23.1%), and corticosteroid use in three
(23.1%). HIV seropositivity was documented in two patients (15.4%), while five
patients (38.5%) had unknown HIV status. Post-operative or traumatic antecedent
was identified in two patients (15.4%). One patient (7.7%) had an unusual
presentation associated with Monkeypox virus co-infection.
The mean PCV was 30.8 ± 7.7%, indicating
anaemia at presentation in most patients. The mean WBC count was 9.5 ± 3.2
x10³/µL. Renal function indices showed variability, with mean creatinine of
100.3 ± 101.3 µmol/L and mean urea of 24.3 ± 24.2 mmol/L, reflecting a subset
with significant renal impairment at presentation. Detailed laboratory findings
are presented in Table 2.
All patients underwent immediate aggressive
surgical debridement under general or spinal anaesthesia, with a mean of 4.9 ±
1.8 debridements (range 2–8) per patient. Triple antibiotic therapy—comprising
a third-generation cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) or nitrofurantoin-based regimen
combined with aminoglycosides and metronidazole—was administered in all cases
based on empirical protocols, subsequently rationalized according to wound
culture and sensitivity results.
The predominant organisms isolated from wound
cultures were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (each 6;
46.2%), followed by Proteus species (5; 38.5%). Polymicrobial infection
was identified in five cases (38.5%). One patient had Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolated in mixed culture. Antibiotic sensitivity patterns guided de-escalation
in the majority; ceftriaxone remained effective against the predominant
Gram-negative isolates.
Following debridement and wound maturation,
wound cover was achieved by secondary intention healing in five patients
(38.5%), secondary closure in four (30.8%), and split-skin grafting in four
(30.8%). The mean hospital stay was 20.3 ± 11.1 days (range 7-36 days). Eleven
patients (84.6%) survived and were discharged, while two patients (15.4%) died,
giving an overall mortality rate of 15.4%. Management outcomes are summarized
in Table 3.
Comparison of clinical and laboratory
parameters between survivors (n=11) and non-survivors (n=2) revealed no
statistically significant difference in age, vital signs, renal indices,
haematological parameters, or number of debridements. However, non-survivors
had numerically higher pulse rates (111.5 ± 0.7 vs 90.6 ± 15.7 bpm, p = 0.199),
higher creatinine (173.5 ± 58.7 vs 87.0 ± 103.4 µmol/L, p = 0.199), higher WBC
(12.9 ± 1.6 vs 8.9 ± 3.1 x10³/µL, p = 0.060), and higher respiratory rates
(29.5 ± 3.5 vs 22.8 ± 3.7 /min, p = 0.091) compared with survivors.
Critically, HIV seropositivity was the only
variable significantly associated with mortality: both non-survivors (2; 100%)
were HIV-positive, while no survivor (0; 0%) was HIV-positive (p = 0.002,
Fisher's exact test). Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and smoking showed no
significant association with mortality. Table 4 summarizes the comparative
analysis between survivors and non-survivors.
Table 1: Sociodemographic and
clinical characteristics of patients with Fournier's gangrene (n=13)
|
Variable |
n
(%) |
Value |
|
Age (years):
mean ± SD (range) |
- |
47.9 ± 12.9 (28–76) |
|
Sex: Male |
13 (100) |
- |
|
Marital Status |
|
|
|
Married |
10 (76.9) |
- |
|
Single |
3 (23.1) |
- |
|
Occupation |
|
|
|
Trading |
5 (38.5) |
- |
|
Farming |
4 (30.8) |
- |
|
Artisan |
3 (23.1) |
- |
|
Civil
Servant |
1 (7.7) |
- |
|
Site of
Involvement |
|
|
|
Scrotum |
6 (46.2) |
- |
|
Perineum/Scrotal extension |
5 (38.5) |
- |
|
Penis |
2 (15.4) |
- |
|
Comorbidities |
|
|
|
Diabetes
mellitus |
6 (46.2) |
- |
|
Hypertension |
3 (23.1) |
- |
|
HIV positive |
2 (15.4) |
- |
|
HIV negative |
6 (46.2) |
- |
|
HIV status
unknown |
5 (38.5) |
- |
|
Steroid use |
3 (23.1) |
- |
|
Post-operative/trauma |
2 (15.4) |
- |
|
Smoking |
6 (46.2) |
- |
|
Vital Signs (at presentation) |
|
|
|
Temperature (°C): mean ± SD |
- |
37.5 ± 0.8 |
|
Respiratory
Rate (/min): mean ± SD |
- |
23.8 ± 4.3 |
|
Pulse Rate (bpm): mean ± SD |
- |
93.8 ± 16.3 |
|
Blood
Pressure (mmHg): mean ± SD |
- |
131.3 ± 14.0 |
Table
2: Laboratory parameters at presentation (n=13)
|
Parameter |
n |
Mean
± SD |
|
Urea (mmol/L) |
13 |
24.3 ± 24.2 |
|
Creatinine (µmol/L) |
13 |
100.3 ± 101.3 |
|
PCV (%) |
13 |
30.8 ± 7.7 |
|
WBC (x10³/µL) |
13 |
9.5 ± 3.2 |
|
Lymphocytes
(x10³/µL)* |
6 |
57.3 ± 26.6 |
|
Platelets (x10³/µL)* |
3 |
97.7 ± 82.8 |
|
Total Protein
(g/L)* |
2 |
77.0 ± 1.4 |
|
Albumin (g/L)* |
2 |
33.0 ± 1.4 |
*
Not available in all patients; PCV = packed cell volume; WBC = white blood cell
count
Table
3: Management and outcomes of patients with Fournier's gangrene (n=13)
|
Variable |
n
(%) |
Value |
|
Surgical
Debridements: mean ± SD (range) |
- |
4.9 ± 1.8 (2–8) |
|
Hospital Stay (days): mean ± SD (range) |
- |
20.3 ± 11.1 (7–36) |
|
Wound Cover
Method |
|
|
|
Secondary
intention healing |
5 (38.5) |
- |
|
Secondary closure |
4 (30.8) |
- |
|
Split skin
grafting |
4 (30.8) |
- |
|
Predominant
Organisms Isolated |
|
|
|
Escherichia
coli (alone/mixed) |
6 (46.2) |
- |
|
Staphylococcus aureus (alone/mixed) |
6 (46.2) |
- |
|
Proteus
species (alone/mixed) |
5 (38.5) |
- |
|
Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
1 (7.7) |
- |
|
Polymicrobial |
5 (38.5) |
- |
|
Outcome |
|
|
|
Survived |
11 (84.6) |
- |
|
Died |
2 (15.4) |
- |
Table 4: Comparison of
clinical and laboratory parameters between survivors and non-survivors
|
Variable |
Survived
(n=11) Mean ± SD |
Died
(n=2) Mean ± SD |
p-value |
|
Age (years) |
47.4 ± 13.7 |
51.0 ± 8.5 |
0.489 |
|
Temperature (°C) |
37.4 ± 0.8 |
37.8 ± 1.1 |
0.513 |
|
Respiratory
Rate (/min) |
22.8 ± 3.7 |
29.5 ± 3.5 |
0.091 |
|
Pulse Rate (bpm) |
90.6 ± 15.7 |
111.5 ± 0.7 |
0.199 |
|
Blood Pressure
(mmHg) |
130.6 ± 15.1 |
135.0 ± 7.1 |
0.550 |
|
Urea (mmol/L) |
27.4 ± 25.1 |
7.1 ± 1.3 |
0.641 |
|
Creatinine
(µmol/L) |
87.0 ± 103.4 |
173.5 ± 58.7 |
0.199 |
|
PCV (%) |
31.5 ± 8.2 |
27.5 ± 0.7 |
0.092 |
|
WBC (x10³/µL) |
8.9 ± 3.1 |
12.9 ± 1.6 |
0.060 |
|
No. of Debridements |
5.0 ± 2.0 |
4.5 ± 0.7 |
0.764 |
|
Hospital Stay
(days) |
21.6 ± 11.6 |
13.0 ± 1.4 |
0.621 |
|
HIV positive — n (%) |
0 (0) |
2 (100) |
0.002* |
|
DM — n (%) |
5 (45.5) |
1 (50.0) |
1.000 |
|
Smoking — n (%) |
6 (54.5) |
0 (0) |
0.514 |
*
Statistically significant (p < 0.05); Fisher's exact test for categorical
variables; Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables
DISCUSSION
This study reports a two-centre experience with
Fournier's gangrene over a six-year period in Nigeria, contributing to the
growing body of evidence on the epidemiology and management of this rare but
life-threatening condition in sub-Saharan Africa. Our overall mortality rate of
15.4% is consistent with reports from comparable African settings, where rates
between 9% and 25% have been documented.⁴,⁵ This is
lower than some earlier Nigerian series—possibly reflecting improvements in
perioperative care, antimicrobial stewardship, and surgical technique over
time—but remains considerably higher than contemporary rates in high-income
countries.⁸,⁹
The exclusive male preponderance in our series
(100%) is consistent with the overwhelming body of literature identifying male
sex as the principal demographic characteristic of FG.¹,¹⁰ The
anatomical complexity of the male external genitalia and perineum, including
its rich fascial planes and the proximity of the urethra, renders this region
particularly vulnerable to the advancing synergistic necrotizing infection.¹¹ A
mean age of 47.9 years observed in this study is aligned with the mid-life peak
reported by similar Nigerian studies,⁶,¹²-18
reflecting the age-related accumulation of metabolic comorbidities and immune
dysfunction that facilitate the disease.
Diabetes mellitus, identified in 46.2% of our
cohort, is well-established as the leading predisposing factor for FG
globally.²,19-22 The hyperglycaemic microenvironment promotes
microvascular insufficiency, impairs neutrophil function, and facilitates
bacterial proliferation, thereby accelerating tissue necrosis.³,23
It is also noteworthy that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors,
increasingly used in diabetic management, have been associated with FG as an
emerging complication.²⁴ Smoking, also present in 46.2%, contributes
through endothelial injury, microvascular impairment, and impaired wound
healing.¹³ The co-occurrence of DM and smoking in a significant proportion of
our patients underscores the importance of metabolic risk factor optimization
in the general population.
The microbiological profile in this study
reflects the polymicrobial synergy characteristic of FG. E. coli and S.
aureus were the predominant isolates (each 46.2%), followed by Proteus
species (38.5%), consistent with the mixed aerobic-anaerobic aetiology
described in previous African series.¹⁴,¹⁵ The
collaborative lytic enzyme production by mixed aerobic-anaerobic flora
generates the characteristic tissue destruction and gas formation, consistent
with the synergistic pathophysiology of polymicrobial infections.²²,25
Notably, one case was associated with Monkeypox virus co-infection,
representing an unusual and emerging aetiology that warrants further
characterization in the West African context.
The finding that HIV seropositivity was the
sole statistically significant predictor of mortality (p = 0.002) in our series
is an important observation. Both patients who died were HIV-positive, and no
survivor was HIV-positive. HIV-related immunosuppression impairs T-cell
mediated and humoral responses, reduces neutrophil chemotaxis, and attenuates
the capacity for wound healing, collectively creating a milieu in which FG
progresses unimpeded.¹⁶ Studies from sub-Saharan Africa, where the HIV
burden is highest globally, have increasingly identified HIV seropositivity as
an independent risk factor for adverse surgical outcomes.¹⁷ Our data
support routine HIV screening on admission for all FG patients, with early
commencement of antiretroviral therapy where applicable, as part of the
management protocol.
Surgical debridement remained the cornerstone
of treatment, with a mean of 4.9 ± 1.8 procedures per patient in this series—a
figure consistent with the iterative nature of necrosectomy required to achieve
adequate source control.⁸ The choice of wound cover was individualized:
secondary intention healing and closure were employed for smaller defects,
while split-skin grafting was used for larger wounds following granulation,
consistent with reported outcomes in comparable series.¹⁸ The absence of
flap reconstruction in this series may reflect resource constraints, though no
patient was lost directly attributable to wound management failure.
Although parameters such as elevated WBC (p =
0.060), raised creatinine (p = 0.199), and tachycardia (p = 0.199) trended
toward significance in non-survivors, these findings align with
morbidity-related predictors of mortality documented in larger series,²⁰
though the small sample size in the present study limited statistical power.
Larger prospective multicentre studies are required to validate the FGSI and
other predictive models in the Nigerian population and to delineate the
independent contribution of HIV to mortality in this setting.
LIMITATIONS
The limitations of this study include its
retrospective design, small sample size, and the relatively short duration of
follow-up precluding analysis of long-term functional outcomes. Additionally,
FGSI could not be calculated for all patients due to incomplete documentation
of some physiological parameters in the hospital records, which represents a
limitation inherent to retrospective studies in resource-limited settings.
CONCLUSION
Fournier's gangrene in our environment
predominantly affects middle-aged men, with diabetes mellitus, smoking, and HIV
seropositivity as key predisposing factors. The polymicrobial microbiological
profile parallels findings from comparable African settings. HIV seropositivity
was the only statistically significant predictor of mortality in this series.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Early aggressive surgical debridement,
broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy guided by culture sensitivity, and routine
HIV screening on admission are recommended to optimize survival outcomes.
Prospective multicentre studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further
validate mortality predictors and improve the management of FG in Nigeria.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.
FINANCIAL SUPPORT AND SPONSORSHIP
None.
REFERENCES
1. Fournier JA. Gangrene foudroyante de la
verge. Sem Med 1883;3:345–8.
2. Laucks SS. Fournier's gangrene. Surg Clin
North Am 1994;74:1339–52.
3. Smith GL, Bunker CB, Dinneen MD. Fournier's gangrene. Br
J Urol 1998;81:347–55.
4. Pet MA, Schmitt AR, Nelson JA, Vercler CJ.
Fournier gangrene: outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa in the context of HIV
seropositivity. Ann Plast Surg 2016;76:548–53.
5. Bekele A, Yitna M, Cherie A, Tilahun T.
Fournier's gangrene: a retrospective study from Ethiopian teaching hospitals.
Int J Surg Open 2020;23:34–9.
6. Adesanya AA, da Rocha-Afodu JT. Fournier's
gangrene in Lagos: a study of 26 cases. Niger Postgrad Med J 2000;7:65–70.
7. Laor E, Palmer LS, Tolia BM, Reid RE, Winter
HI. Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier's gangrene. J Urol
1995;154:89–92.
8. Morpurgo E, Galandiuk S. Fournier's gangrene.
Surg Clin North Am 2002;82:1213–24.
9. Thwaini A, Khan A, Malik A, Cherian J, Barua
J, Shergill I, et al. Fournier's gangrene and its
emergency management. Postgrad Med
J 2006;82:516–9.
10. Oguz A, Gümüş M, Turkoglu A, Bozdağ
Z, Ülger BV, Agaçayak E, et al. Fournier's gangrene: a
summary of 10 years of clinical experience. Int Surg 2015;100:934–41.
11. Cullen IM, Larkin JO, Moore M, Defeters N,
Flood HD. Fournier's gangrene: analysis of 16 cases at a single tertiary
centre. Surgeon 2009;7:296–301.
12. Onuora VC, Kanu IO, Udefiagbon EO. Periurethral
approach to the management of Fournier's gangrene. Niger J Clin Pract
2009;12:32–5.
13. Akhlaq A, Khan UA, Hassan K. Fournier's
gangrene: a study of predisposing factors in a developing country. J Coll
Physicians Surg Pak 2016;26:832–5.
14. Fahal AH, Hassan MA. Fournier's gangrene: a
six-year experience. Br J Surg 1997;84:26–8.
15. Hasamnis AA, Patil SS, Bhosle KS, Ahmed I.
Bacteriological profile of Fournier's gangrene: a hospital-based study. J Sci
Soc 2011;38:79–82.
16. Vriens PW, Bakker HH, De Boorder T, Leguit P.
Fournier's gangrene in a patient with HIV infection. Neth J Surg 1990;42:59–60.
17. Toogood GJ, Porter KA. Fournier's gangrene: an
aetiological factor in common with other serious necrotising infections. Ann R
Coll Surg Engl 1995;77:82–5.
18. Maggio PR, Tuchscherr M, Yuen JC. Fournier's
gangrene: long-term outcomes with vacuum-assisted wound closure and split-skin
grafting. Eplasty 2011;11:e35.
19. Nonino H, Camargo JL, Penteado S, Goffredo LM.
Fournier's gangrene: analysis of 29 cases. Int Braz J Urol 2010;36:606–11.
20. Falagas ME, Velakoulis S, Iavazzo C, Rafailidis
PI. Morbidity-related predictors of mortality in patients with Fournier's
gangrene. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007;26:671–4.
21. Ayumba BR, Masinde A, Nwokoma NJ. Fournier's
gangrene in Maiduguri, north-eastern Nigeria: predisposing factors and outcome
of treatment. Niger J Clin Pract 2012;15:34–7.
22. Johnson CC, Baldessarre J, Levison ME.
Peritonitis: update on pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and
management. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:1035–47.
23. Etziony MS, Merimsky E, Baratz M. Fournier's
gangrene. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1984;29:40–2.
24. Hidalgo Grau L, Llorca Cardeñosa A, Llorca
Cardeñosa T, Serra Aracil X, Dot Bach J, Morales Badus M, et al. Fournier's
gangrene as a complication of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a
systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2019;21:949–57.
25. Nash E, Draper B. Fournier's gangrene: review of the literature. Urology 1978;11:467–70.
[CA1]The two hospitals
can be stated here eg. Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi….